How New US Age Verification Bills Threaten Online Privacy, Anonymity, and VPN Use

Featured image: Photo by Zulfugar Karimov on Pexels.

New legislative efforts across the United States are proposing stringent age verification requirements for accessing various online platforms. While often framed as measures to protect minors, these bills introduce significant threats to the privacy, anonymity, and security of all internet users. From state-level initiatives targeting social media to federal proposals aimed at adult content and online services, the common thread is a demand for real-identity verification that could fundamentally alter how we interact online, creating vast new databases of sensitive personal information and undermining fundamental digital rights.

The Broad Reach of Age Verification Mandates

Many of these new age verification bills are far-reaching, extending beyond their stated intentions. For example, some state laws initially presented as ways to regulate youth access to social media can, in practice, deny young people under 16 access to major online services as they currently exist. This is because these bills often broadly define “addictive features,” encompassing virtually any functional recommendation algorithm that relies on basic user inputs like who a user follows or what posts they like [1]. To comply, platforms would need to strip away such features, forcing young users onto a “stripped-down, dysfunctional version of social media,” which critics argue burdens their constitutional right to access information and participate in public discourse [1].

A federal bill, the SCREEN Act, similarly extends its scope far beyond its initial premise of regulating sexually explicit content. Unlike many state laws, this act does not require that a significant portion of a website consist of content deemed harmful to minors. Instead, it would apply to nearly any online service hosting even a single piece of sexually explicit content. This means that not only adult content sites but also streaming services like Netflix, and social media platforms such as Reddit or Discord, could be compelled to verify the ages of their users if they host any such material [2]. Such broad application necessitates age verification for millions of adult internet users, forcing them to surrender their anonymity and privacy to access lawful speech [2].

Another legislative proposal, the CHATBOT Act, focuses on online services used by teenagers, particularly those involving conversational tools. While this bill claims not to mandate age verification directly, it imposes obligations that hinge on a service knowing if a user is under 18 [3]. The potential liability for incorrectly assessing a user’s age creates significant pressure on online service providers to implement stricter forms of age verification to differentiate between minors, teenagers, and adults [3]. This regulatory environment compels platforms to collect more personal data from users to avoid legal repercussions, regardless of the service’s primary function.

The Perils of Invasive Verification Methods

The core problem with these age verification mandates lies in the methods required for compliance. Simply asking a user to confirm they are an adult is deemed insufficient by these bills [2]. In practice, this means platforms would have to verify users’ ages using methods tied to their real identities. This is a dramatic departure from showing an ID in the physical world, where a bouncer visually checks an ID and returns it [2]. Online, the “bouncer” becomes a digital age-verification service that captures sensitive personal information and stores it in a database for an unspecified duration [2].

To reliably verify age, platforms are likely to demand the strictest forms of verification. This often includes requiring users to upload government-issued IDs, such as driver’s licenses or passports, or submitting to biometric scanning [1], [3]. These methods create “massive honeypots of sensitive personal data,” making users of all ages vulnerable to security breaches and identity theft [1], [3]. Relying on biometric systems is particularly problematic due to historical inaccuracies in estimating ages across different races and genders [1]. The creation of centralized databases containing such highly personal information poses immense risks, making them attractive targets for hackers, identity thieves, and even civil litigants [3].

Erosion of Anonymity and Data Security Risks

The push for real-identity age verification directly undermines online anonymity, a critical component of free expression and privacy. When every online interaction requires proof of identity, the ability to engage in public discourse, seek information, or simply browse without being tracked is severely diminished. Forcing users to turn over their personal information to third-party verification services means that a user’s online activity can be linked directly to their real-world identity, destroying the protective layer of anonymity that many rely on for legitimate purposes [2].

Moreover, the data security protections offered by these bills are often weak. While some bills may require services to take “reasonable steps” to protect collected data and not maintain it longer than necessary, these are often vague standards that impose no meaningful limits on collection, use, or retention [2]. This allows third-party age verification companies to collect vast amounts of personal information—far more than necessary—and potentially use it for various purposes, as long as they deem their actions “reasonable” [2]. The longer this sensitive data is retained, and the more widely it is shared among different services and third-party verifiers, the greater the risk of data breaches and misuse. The accumulation of such detailed personal information about individuals, including their online conversations and activities, creates a trove of data that could be exploited in numerous ways, from targeted advertising to surveillance, without adequate safeguards [3].

Targeting VPNs and Proxy Servers

A particularly concerning aspect of some of these legislative efforts is their direct attack on privacy-enhancing technologies like Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). The SCREEN Act, for instance, specifically targets VPN users and providers. It mandates that covered websites verify users’ ages based on their IP addresses unless the service can confirm the user is outside the United States, and explicitly requires age verification for traffic originating from known VPN addresses [2].

This provision directly discourages the use of VPNs and proxy servers, which millions of people use for entirely legitimate reasons. VPNs are essential tools for protecting personal privacy by masking a user’s real location, securing public Wi-Fi connections, safeguarding journalists and activists operating in sensitive environments, and preventing unwanted data tracking [2]. By forcing users who intentionally employ these tools to protect their privacy to identify themselves, these bills penalize a fundamental right to secure and anonymous online communication. This legislative approach treats the use of privacy tools as inherently suspect, rather than recognizing their critical role in maintaining digital security and freedom [2].

Key Takeaways

• New age verification bills often extend beyond their stated purpose, impacting a wide range of online services from social media to streaming platforms.
• These bills typically require real-identity verification, compelling users to submit government IDs or undergo biometric scans.
• Such invasive methods create massive databases of sensitive personal data, increasing the risk of security breaches and identity theft for all users.
• The mandates erode online anonymity, making it harder for individuals to engage in free expression and access information privately.
• Some legislation directly targets VPNs, undermining a crucial tool for privacy, security, and anonymity for millions of legitimate users.

Sources

1. [1] Amending AB 1709 Doesn’t Fix It: California’s Social Media Ban Still Threatens Free Speech and Privacy (www.eff.org)
2. [2] The SCREEN Act Threatens Privacy Far Beyond Adult Websites (www.eff.org)
3. [3] The CHATBOT Act Forces One Parenting Model On Every Family (www.eff.org)

StealthAnon is a news and analysis site covering cybersecurity, privacy, web analytics, anonymity, and tech tools.